Re: ZWNBSP vs. WJ

From: Andreas Prilop <prilop4321_at_trashmail.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:44:20 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, I wrote:

> Example:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sfnet.huuhaa/msg/4a7b0cae182e8c50
> http://groups.google.com/group/sfnet.huuhaa/msg/4a7b0cae182e8c50&dmode=source

Make that:
http://groups.google.com/group/sfnet.huuhaa/msg/4a7b0cae182e8c50?dmode=source
Received on Fri Aug 05 2011 - 11:46:38 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: naoto.sato_at_oracle.com: "Auto Reply: Re: ZWNBSP vs. WJ"
Previous message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ZWNBSP vs. WJ"
In reply to: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ZWNBSP vs. WJ"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag (w): "Re: ZWNBSP vs. WJ (was: How is NBH (U0083) Implemented?)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 05 2011 - 11:46:38 CDT