Namely, there are two characters that could be considered candidates:
no-vinculum radical symbol and radical extension.
Leo
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Leo Broukhis <leob_at_mailcom.com> wrote:
> In light of W*dings fonts being reviewed as a source of addenda to
> Unicode and the reasons for disunification mentioned in N4115, I'd
> like to ask if there is anything in the Symbol font that is not yet
> adequately represented by encoded characters (to wit:
> http://www.numericana.com/about.htm) and that could be added as
> separate Unicode codepoints to put the Symbol font issue to rest.
Received on Fri Aug 12 2011 - 16:20:49 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 12 2011 - 16:20:49 CDT