RE: RTL PUA?

People do all kinds of fancy things. I guess old manuscripts contain many
ligatures, but I don't think this kind of joining should be required for the
RTL PUA.

Jony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: unicore-bounce2_at_unicode.org [mailto:unicore-bounce2_at_unicode.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Everson
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 12:51 PM
> To: unicore UnicoRe Discussion; Unicode Discussion List
> Subject: Re: RTL PUA?
>
> On 21 Aug 2011, at 10:43, Jonathan Rosenne wrote:
>
> > Yes, this is why an RTL etc. PUA area is quite useful.
> >
> > BTW, I am not aware of joining in properly written cursive Hebrew.
>
> I've seen a nice shin-lamed ligature in some styles.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Received on Sun Aug 21 2011 - 05:46:15 CDT