On Monday 22 August 2011, Andrew West <andrewcwest_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone think of a way to extend UTF-16 without adding new surrogates or inventing a new general category?
>
> Andrew
How about a triple sequence of two high surrogates followed by one low surrogate?
I suggest this as a solution to the problem that is posed by Andrew as I feel that it would be interesting to know if that would be possible or whether it would be forbidden due to an existing policy that has already been guaranteed to be unchangeable.
William Overington
22 August 2011
Received on Mon Aug 22 2011 - 11:38:11 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 22 2011 - 11:38:12 CDT