Re: Multiple private agreements (was: RE: Code pages and Unicode)

From: Luke-Jr <luke_at_dashjr.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:25:41 -0400

On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:29:58 PM Philippe Verdy wrote:
> 2011/8/24 Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>:
> > (3) which contains the same PUA code point with two meanings
> The only numbered item to sacifice is number (3) here. that's the case
> where separate PUA agreements are still coordinated so that they don't
> use the same PUA assignments. This is the case of PUA greements in the
> Conscript registry.

Too bad the Conscript registry is censoring assignments the maintainer doesn't
like for unspecified personal reasons, increasing the chances of an overlap.
Received on Tue Aug 23 2011 - 22:29:34 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 23 2011 - 22:29:39 CDT