Re: ligature usage - WAS: How do we find out what assigned code points aren't normally used in text?

From: Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:53:12 +0100

On 11 Sep 2011, at 00:23, Richard Wordingham wrote:

> A font need not support such ligation, but a glyph for U+FB01 must
> ligate the letters - otherwise it's not U+FB01!

Not in monowidth, it doesn't.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Received on Sat Sep 10 2011 - 18:57:01 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kent Karlsson: "Re: ligature usage - WAS: How do we find out what assigned code points aren't normally used in text?"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: ligature usage - WAS: How do we find out what assigned code points aren't normally used in text?"
In reply to: Richard Wordingham: "Re: ligature usage - WAS: How do we find out what assigned code points aren't normally used in text?"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ligature usage - WAS: How do we find out what assigned code points aren't normally used in text?"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ligature usage - WAS: How do we find out what assigned code points aren't normally used in text?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Sep 10 2011 - 18:57:03 CDT