Re: Continue: Glaring Mistake in the Code List of South Asian Script, Reply to Daug Ewell and Others

From: Peter Zilahy Ingerman, PhD <pzi_at_ingerman.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:27:02 -0400

Truly, a fanatic redoubles his efforts when he loses sight of his goal.

Peter Ingerman

On 2011-09-12 07:21, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 06:01 AM, delex r wrote:
>> Anyone who is not aware of fact and want to find out in unicode about
>> Assamese Raw (09F1) or Assamese Wa(09F1) will find it absurd and
>> difficult as if he is being asked to find out London in the map of
>> Germany.
>>
>
> See above. You're absolutely, 100% right, and you obviously have seen
> something we've all missed. (Actually, I don't know whether you are
> or not, but let's assume you are). Thank you for pointing out this
> glaring mistake in Unicode's naming. This glaring mistake will remain
> a glaring mistake, just like the spelling of "BRAKCET" instead of
> "bracket" will remain in U+FE18.
>
> You're totally right in everything you have said (we'll assume). No
> need to try to convince us anymore, we believe you. No names will be
> changed, anyway.
>
> ~mark
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Sep 12 2011 - 07:30:59 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Sep 12 2011 - 07:31:00 CDT