2011/9/14 Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14_at_telia.com>:
>> And how will you define what is an "implicit" LDM ? For example "1.2"
>
> Did you actually READ my submission re. the PRI? Seems like not. There is a
> suggestion there (which requires a bit of character contextual processing).
> It is also possible to use a different analysis for special cases, e.g.
> domain names or URLs (if detectable somehow, e.g. via markup).
Yes I have read it, and I'm convinced this will not work. It breaks
the UBA in a non-conforming and incompatible way. I'm now sure that
LDM is not even needed if the UBA is implemented correctly.
Received on Wed Sep 14 2011 - 12:59:20 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 14 2011 - 12:59:21 CDT