Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

From: James Kass <jameskass_at_att.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:54:52 -0800 (PST)

Shriramana Sharma already explained it to you, even better than I could, see: http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m02/0020.html
James Kass

--- On Fri, 2/3/12, Luke-Jr <luke_at_dashjr.org> wrote:

From: Luke-Jr <luke_at_dashjr.org>
Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge
To: "James Kass" <jameskass_at_att.net>
Cc: unicode_at_unicode.org
Date: Friday, February 3, 2012, 6:50 PM

On Friday, February 03, 2012 1:47:32 PM James Kass wrote:
> Printed documents aren't binary,

GPL doesn't talk about binary. It talks about "source code" and not-source-
code. Source code is defined as the form you edit it in, in a standard
computer format. So printed documents *always* have "source code".

> so perhaps normal paper book copyright applies to them.

Not without the exception.
Received on Fri Feb 03 2012 - 12:57:02 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 03 2012 - 12:57:03 CST