Re: Emoji domains

-On [20120226 21:11], Stephane Bortzmeyer (bortzmeyer_at_nic.fr) wrote:
>Note that it is a direct violation of RFC 5892. U+1F4A9, being of
>category So, should be DISALLOWED. The registry was wrong to accept
>it.

Oh, this will be fun. So I guess they did not check the codepoint categories
in their validation step then? (I honestly have no idea how NICs do this
nowadays, it's been ages since I messed with stuff on that level.)

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Is this all there is of me..?