Julian Bradfield wrote:
>> ISO/IEC 9995-9 cannot be implemented natively on Microsoft Windows;
>> it  requires a third-party add-on package such as Keyman, which is
>> not free.
>
> I don't understand this remark. Microsoft Windows is not free, so what
> does it matter whether there's a free addon or not?
Users and companies often aren't inclined to pay extra for third-party 
solutions to problems that are generally perceived to be part of the 
operating-system domain, such as keyboard layouts.
> If ISO/IEC 9995-9 becomes a standard, then Microsoft will presumably 
> support it, either themselves or by buying Keyman.
Or they could revamp their keyboard model to support multiple dead keys 
and a fifth (and beyond) shift state, and produce (or commission) 
physical keyboards with more keys so users could get into those shift 
states. But those don't exist today (and Michael Kaplan has blogged 
often about the difficulty of changing this model), and meanwhile Karl's 
comment seemed to be that support for U+20B9 existed *today* in the 
ISO/IEC 9995-9 draft.
Changes in standards don't always translate to commercial support. I 
never did find a pre-packaged Windows layout for the common secondary 
layout of ISO/IEC 9995-3:2002 (which the new version proudly dubs 
"outdated," though the difference seems to be more a matter of less 
complete vs. more complete than old-fashioned vs. modern).
> If they don't, then there are other operating systems.
Users often don't get to pick their platform, especially in a corporate 
environment, and especially for reasons like keyboard support for a 
single new character.
> Defects in one OS have no relevance for standards - although they may
> be a pain for a little while (e.g. Linux' rather slow support for
> Unicode).
Anand Kumar Sharma didn't specify a particular vendor, but he asked 
about the key position "when new keyboard with rupee symbol will come 
into market." He did use the term "U.S.-English keyboard," a term I 
suppose is used by all vendors, not just Microsoft. Since changes in 
standards don't always translate to commercial support, I answered in 
terms of a vendor I was familiar with. Users of other platforms may have 
different stories.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell Received on Mon May 28 2012 - 15:47:24 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 28 2012 - 15:47:26 CDT