On 30 May 2012 16:12, Andrew West <andrewcwest_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And (鱼芒) on page 4.
>
> But that is an unencoded simplified form of U+29DF6 𩷶
Oddly, the editors have created a new glyph for the unencoded
simplified form of U+29DF6 𩷶, but have not done the same for U+9BA1 鮡
and U+9B88 鮈 (for which there are no corresponding encoded simplified
forms), which they print using the traditional form characters. I
suppose this is because they were unaware of the existence of U+29DF6
𩷶 (or did not have an appropriate font), and so had to create a glyph
for the character anyway.
Andrew
Received on Wed May 30 2012 - 10:28:31 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 30 2012 - 10:28:32 CDT