Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
> The only requirement of Unicode was to provide a way to map Shift-JIS
> encoded text involving emoji to Unicode / 10646 in a way that could be
> round-tripped,
This is the part that has always confused me. At what point does text
encoded in a vendor's private-use extension to Shift-JIS become
"Shift-JIS encoded text"? Because I know for sure that I'm not supposed
to refer to characters assigned to the Unicode PUA, my own or anyone
else's, as being "encoded in Unicode."
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell Received on Fri Jun 01 2012 - 15:54:34 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 01 2012 - 15:54:35 CDT