Are Named sequences always going to be graphemes?

From: Karl Williamson <public_at_khwilliamson.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:22:06 -0600

All current named sequences appear to be each a single grapheme. That
seems like it should always be the case. If I'm right, should UAX #34
say this.
Received on Wed Jun 20 2012 - 17:30:07 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ken Whistler: "Re: Are Named sequences always going to be graphemes?"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Offlist: complex rendering"
Next in thread: Ken Whistler: "Re: Are Named sequences always going to be graphemes?"
Reply: Ken Whistler: "Re: Are Named sequences always going to be graphemes?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 20 2012 - 17:30:31 CDT