Re: Are Named sequences always going to be graphemes?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Ken Whistler <kenw_at_sybase.com> wrote:
> I don't see any necessary correlation between what sequences
> people might end up insisting on naming (for whatever reason) and what
> people might consider to be "graphemes".

I submit that the following sequence shall be allotted named sequence status:

\u0053\u0048\u0052\u0049\u0052\u0041\u004D\u0041\u004E\u0041

;-)

-- 
Shriramana Sharma