On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:31:59 +0530
Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> And you will certainly agree that a non-native cannot immediately know
> what is the significance of the Indic character names DA vs DDA (vs
> DDDA or DDDDA), SSA, RRA, NNA, NNNA, LLA, LLLA and so on! :-)
On the contrary, doubling for (historical) retroflexion is a fairly
clear convention.
Richard.
Received on Sun Jul 08 2012 - 08:04:14 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 08 2012 - 08:04:16 CDT