Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON

From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:13:23 +0100

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:14:03 -0700
Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> > Depends whether you think Britain is in Europe;-)

> That's a lovely question...

Well if France isn't - Philippe Verdy says he has used '÷' for division
- I don't think Britain can be.

Richard.
Received on Tue Jul 10 2012 - 17:18:00 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "RE: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 10 2012 - 17:18:01 CDT