Re: Ewellic again (was: Re: Romanized Singhala - Think about it again)

My error. Sorry, Doug.

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:

> Unicode character database goes from zero to some very big number. There
>> are no holes in it to define character sets for somebody's fancy. Well,
>> Doug Ewell did one for Esparanto expanding fuþorc.
>>
>
> Ewellic is not futhorc. They are different scripts.
>
> From the Omniglot page on Ewellic (with *emphasis* added):
> "The shape of Ewellic letters was *inspired by* the Runic and Cirth
> scripts, but shows greater (though still imperfect) regularity of form."
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
> http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell ­
>
>
>
Received on Sun Jul 15 2012 - 14:32:51 CDT