On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:57:02 +0100
Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com> wrote:
> But there is no reason to rush forward encoding a tiny subset of an
> important and complex script on some assumption that those characters
> don't interact with other characters in the script in a meaningful
> way. That is asking for trouble in encoding.
On the other hand, I think many of us would be a lot happier if
the cuneiform numerals in modern use had been encoded first!
Richard.
Received on Mon Aug 20 2012 - 19:44:21 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 20 2012 - 19:44:22 CDT