Buck Golemon wrote:
> latin1 explicitly doesn't define characters (or control codes) in
> those ranges, but unicode does.
See Ken's comment about Chapter 16. Both ISO 8859-1 and Unicode defer
the *actual interpretation* of control characters to ISO 6429, which is
what you are looking for.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell Received on Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:49:06 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:49:06 CST