Fwd: Re: Question about normalization tests

Ah yes, I did indeed miss the "equal to" part. I fixed up my code and
now it works as expected.

Thanks to Mark and Ken for your help and speedy response!

Edwin

On 12/10/2012 12:57 PM, Whistler, Ken wrote:
>
> Your misunderstanding is at the highlighted statement below. Actually
> 0300 **is** blocked from 0061 in this sequence, because it is preceded
> by a character with the same canonical combining class (i.e. U+0305,
> ccc=230). A blocking context is the preceding combining character
> either having ccc=0 or having ccc greater than *or equal to* the
> character being checked.
>
>
>
> --Ken
>
>
>
Received on Mon Dec 10 2012 - 16:02:55 CST