Re: FW: Why are the low surrogates numerically larger than the high surrogates?

From: Markus Scherer <markus.icu_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:44:23 -0800

FYI: Because of this confusion, in ICU APIs and documentation we prefer to
talk about "lead surrogates" and "trail surrogates", in analogy to MBCS
lead & trail bytes.

markus
Received on Wed Jan 23 2013 - 14:47:32 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: FW: Why are the low surrogates numerically larger than the high surrogates?"
Previous message: Whistler, Ken: "FW: Why are the low surrogates numerically larger than the high surrogates?"
In reply to: Whistler, Ken: "FW: Why are the low surrogates numerically larger than the high surrogates?"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: FW: Why are the low surrogates numerically larger than the high surrogates?"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: FW: Why are the low surrogates numerically larger than the high surrogates?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 23 2013 - 14:47:32 CST