Re: Text in composed normalized form is king, right? Does anyone generate text in decomposed normalized form?

From: Julian Bradfield <jcb+unicode_at_inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 23:51:34 +0000 (GMT)

On 2013-02-01, Costello, Roger L. <costello_at_mitre.org> wrote:
> So why would one ever generate text in decomposed form (NFD)?

Text that I type is quite likely to be in decomposed (or at least not
composed) form, because I find it a lot easier to have a few keystrokes
for combining accents than to set up compose key sequences for all the
possible composed characters.
For example,
ǂhèẽ-ǂhèẽ ǃn̥à̰ĩ-ǃn̥à̰ĩ
was part of the title of a talk. Is there a composed form of à̰? I
don't know, and don't want to!
Much easier to do searches and other text processing on it, too.
(The current dictionary project for this language uses NFD in its data
files, too.)

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Fri Feb 01 2013 - 17:59:45 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 01 2013 - 17:59:52 CST