On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Erkki I Kolehmainen <eik_at_iki.fi> wrote:
> It may also be the result of a negotiating process within a special purpose user group.
I also see no problem with the current definition. Since the whole
point of the standard is to ease the exchange of text if a particular
section of the PUA is to be useful in exchange of text among a certain
community (say the users of a conscript) then there has to be an
implicit or explicit private agreement among them regarding that
section of the PUA. Even when you use a font which contains a
particular glyph at a PUA code point, you "agree" to use that
codepoint to represent that written form.
-- Shriramana SharmaReceived on Mon Feb 18 2013 - 09:40:29 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 18 2013 - 09:40:30 CST