Re: Why wasn't it possible to encode a coeng-like joiner for Tibetan?

On 2013/04/11 16:30, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2013, at 00:09, Shriramana Sharma<samjnaa_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Or was the Khmer model of an invisible joiner a *later* bright idea?
>
> Yes.

Later, yes. Bright? Most Kambodian experts disagree.

Regards, Martin.
Received on Fri Apr 12 2013 - 05:14:27 CDT