> The text in question is not exactly new to Unicode 6.2, probably goes
> back to around the time
> UTF-8 and UTF-16 were added over a decade ago. Getting a single question
> on this passage after all these years would seem to indicate that
> confusion isn't exactly rampant.
Just to address the textual question:
TUS 4.0 Section 2.5, p. 28. So it was language added in 2003, 10 years ago.
--Ken
Received on Thu Aug 29 2013 - 12:54:50 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 29 2013 - 12:54:52 CDT