On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com> wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2013, at 15:29, Leo Broukhis <leob_at_mailcom.com> wrote:
>
>> Hasn't http://www.unicode.org/standard/where/#Variant_Shapes explained it once and for all?
>
> No, because users of N-shaped capital Eng consider n-shaped capital Eng to be *WRONG*, not an acceptable variant. And because n-shaped capital Eng consider N-shaped capital Eng to be *WRONG*, not an acceptable variant.
>
> Disunification is the best solution.
>
> I suppose nothing will happen until the governments of eng-using countries come together with a proposal.
What if not every user of one form considers it wrong to use the other form?
What if there’s evidence of use of both forms in those languages?
What if the users who consider the other shape wrong are unaware of
the history or variation of their own orthographies?
-- Denis Moyogo Jacquerye African Network for Localisation http://www.africanlocalisation.net/ Nkótá ya Kongó míbalé --- http://info-langues-congo.1sd.org/ DejaVu fonts --- http://www.dejavu-fonts.org/Received on Fri Dec 13 2013 - 01:35:09 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 13 2013 - 01:35:09 CST