Anne: Given that the intent is to implement exactly the whatwg spec, and
the group is currently called "whatwg" (even though it may eventually
become a historical artifact), is "whatwg-1252" most appropriate?
Norbert Lindenberg previously suggested standardizing some kind of
disambiguation.
http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m12/0022.html
Do you most prefer the s/web-/cp/ pattern?
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk_at_annevk.nl>wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Markus Scherer <markus.icu_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Buck Golemon <buck_at_yelp.com> wrote:
> >> I've been considering naming it cp1252-whatwg.
> >
> > It would be nicer to put the organization name first, such as
> whatwg-cp1252
> > or maybe better html-cp1252. That would be more like ibm-932 and such.
>
> If you want to support more encodings than
> http://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/ defines I suggest using the prefix
> "web-". The organization may change and this is not tied to HTML.
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Wed Jan 29 2014 - 13:58:09 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 29 2014 - 13:58:09 CST