Re: Guillements in Email

From: Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 19:41:49 +0200

Yes I know But in the first message it was not used.

I do not criticize the fact of using quoted-printable; but the fact that of
NOT using it to preserve characters; based on an arbitrary selection of
characters that Google considers worth preserving only when they appear in
combination of other characters If people want to send guillemets, there's
no reson this depends on the presence of other characters (well they are
sent; but only in HTML but not in the plain text part).

I consider this a bug from Google (probably in old tricky code unreviewed
since very long).

2014-05-02 19:11 GMT+02:00 Richard Wordingham <
richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>:

> On Fri, 2 May 2014 17:57:37 +0200
> Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> > Apparently not. There's a difference: Gmail now used
> > quoted-printable, that preserves these guillemets (as =AB and =BB)
> > even if they are still encoded with ISO8859-1 (without replacement by
> > ASCII pairs of symbols).
>
> Using quoted-printable is usual for sending ISO-8859-1 through 7-bit
> channels.
>
> Richard.
> _______________________________________________
> Unicode mailing list
> Unicode_at_unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>

_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Fri May 02 2014 - 12:44:10 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 02 2014 - 12:44:10 CDT