On Mon, 12 May 2014 21:54:32 +0200
Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> 2014-05-12 10:03 GMT+02:00 Richard Wordingham <
> richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>:
>
> > Dependent vowels on independent vowels generally modify rather than
> > replace the vowel sound of the independent vowel. Balinese
> > provides a simple example; the Brahmi length mark has retained or
> > regained its independence and is regularly applied to both
> > independent and dependent vowels.
I was writing in haste; the use of the length mark is not as regular as
I thought it was.
> Hmmm... The length mark itself is not a dependant vowel by itself,
> it's a modifier that follows a vowel (dependant or not).
It's counted as such in the Balinese script, and has become such in
most Indic scripts, being the dependent vowel AA.
> Indic abugidas on the opposite have not distinguished this
> null-consonnant explicitly; but it still exists logically as an
> unbreakable combination of that null-consonnant and the dependant
> vowel.
In mainland SE Asia the distinction is made. The independent vowel
whose vowel is the implicit vowel has been reinterpreted as the
consonant for a glottal stop, and is combined with the dependent
vowels. Several scripts, e.g. Tibetan and Thai, have largely done away
with the independent vowels.
Richard.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Mon May 12 2014 - 16:59:32 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 12 2014 - 16:59:32 CDT