> Of course not. But that's been a stated condition for labeling something
> as "compatibility."
It *is* compatibility; go back and read my email where I mentioned exactly
where it was used.
↪ Shervin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:
> Mark Davis ☕️ <mark at macchiato dot com> wrote:
>
> >> In what character encoding standard, or extension, does ROBOT FACE
> >> appear?
> >
> > Unicode has never been limited to what is in other character encoding
> > standard or extensions, "official" or de facto.
>
> Of course not. But that's been a stated condition for labeling something
> as "compatibility."
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA | http://ewellic.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Tue Feb 10 2015 - 12:09:33 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 10 2015 - 12:09:33 CST