Tim Partridge <timpart_at_perdix.demon.co.uk> writes:
> Antoine Méric said
>> I was wondering, has the question « Given the massive usage over
> time
>> of the glyph, and the number of academic papers about it, should we
> consider
>>adding a PHALLIC REPRESENTATION to the unicode standard ? » ever been
> asked ?
>
> The Ancient Egyptians had some glyphs to act as determinatives for
> words that relate to that topic, and they are encoded in the standard.
> See U+130B8 to A.
Good grief, I don’t like the look of U+130B9. Maybe I don’t want to know
what’s going on 🙉.
-- Ian ◎ _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode_at_unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicodeReceived on Mon Feb 16 2015 - 05:49:22 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 16 2015 - 05:49:24 CST