Thanks Doug.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 at 17:45 Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:
>
> In other, other words, something like "[flag]LGBT" should be a
> non-starter.
>
Followed until this bit. Why would it be a non-starter?
> If you are still suggesting a single character, this thread doesn't
> affect that suggestion at all.
>
I don't know enough about how the Consortium functions to understand my
best course of action. Looking for advisement on (a) what is most likely to
pass UTC muster, and (b) what is most likely to result in rainbow flag
emojis being available widely in the near future.
Received on Wed Jul 01 2015 - 13:40:12 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2015 - 13:40:12 CDT