On 07/29/2015 09:42 AM, William_J_G Overington wrote:
>
> The easiest thing appears to be to not call the items emoji.
>
> I opine that a new word is needed to mean the following.
>
> A character that looks like it is an emoji character yet has
> precise semantics.
>
So, like, a localizable sentence character? Something that has a
precise, sentence-level meaning that is not linguistically determined?
We aren't doing those here, as far as I know.
~mark
Received on Wed Jul 29 2015 - 23:02:27 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 29 2015 - 23:02:27 CDT