Re: Implementing SMP on a UTF-16 OS

From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:25:20 +0100

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:08:55 +0200
Max Truxa <unicode_at_maxtruxa.com> wrote:

> Correct syntax would be: [...] 0xD835, 0xDCEA, 0xD835, 0xDCD0, [...]

> IMO this mailing list is not the right place for questions about C
> syntax, is it not?

View it as a gripe about UTF-16 and how confusing things get when code
units are referred to as characters.
Received on Mon Aug 10 2015 - 15:27:00 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marcel Schneider: "Re: Implementing SMP on a UTF-16 OS"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: Implementing SMP on a UTF-16 OS (was: Windows keyboard restrictions)"
In reply to: Max Truxa: "Re: Implementing SMP on a UTF-16 OS"
Next in thread: Marcel Schneider: "Re: Implementing SMP on a UTF-16 OS"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 10 2015 - 15:27:00 CDT