Le 09/02/2016 16:58, Michael Everson a écrit :
>> For completeness sake, one could also make a case for the following:
>> >
>> > • LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ WITH ACUTES;
>> > • LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ WITH ACUTES.
> Or IJ (or ij) + combining double acute.
The rendering of these in a standard font (IJ̋ij̋) is usually quite bad.
While non ligated character should render correctly (ÍJ́íj́).
Frédéric
Received on Tue Feb 09 2016 - 10:17:08 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 09 2016 - 10:17:08 CST