Re: Additional decompositions in decomps.txt

From: Ken Whistler <kenwhistler_at_att.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:59:24 -0800

Yes, that is correct.

--Ken

On 2/22/2016 11:10 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> OK, thanks. So conceptually, all those additional decompositions are
> all in the same class as those tagged "<sort>", in that they don't
> originate from the UCD, but were added for collation purposes, is that
> correct?
Received on Mon Feb 22 2016 - 14:00:54 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ken Whistler: "Just so story: Why isn't o-slash decomposed? (was: Re: Character folding in text editors)"
Previous message: Eli Zaretskii: "Re: Additional decompositions in decomps.txt"
In reply to: Eli Zaretskii: "Re: Additional decompositions in decomps.txt"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 22 2016 - 14:00:55 CST