Re: Mende Kikakui Number 10

From: Andrew Cunningham <lang.support_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:51:27 +1000

Hi Phillipe,

On Saturday, 11 June 2016, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> OK, <ONE;combining TEENS> represents 11, but <ONE;combining TENS> is not
clearly represents 10, and the proposals do not exhibit 10 with the same
glyph as PU (even if it is based on it, in fact the combining TENS is a
small subscript glyph variant of letter/syllable PU intended to mark
digits).
>

Mende Kikakui script disolays a high degree of glyph variation. Some
variations minor, some variations more substantive.

The syllable PU can be found as it is in the charts, it can be found
looking like the number 10. Other variations are also observed.

The ideal situation would have been to encode the number 10. But in its
absence, I guess ONE+TENS may be the approach. Even though it seems less
than ideal.

A.

A.

-- 
Andrew Cunningham
lang.support_at_gmail.com
Received on Fri Jun 10 2016 - 16:52:36 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 10 2016 - 16:52:36 CDT