rlig is the quickest and easiest approach. But in theory could be done
other more complicated ways.
There are currently no opentype implementations that I know of. And no
known shapers. rlig hopefully works with general shapers. But what what ot
features will be expected by script specific shaper is still an unknown.
On Saturday, 11 June 2016, Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com> wrote:
> On 11 Jun 2016, at 02:47, Andrew Cunningham <lang.support_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> It can be done via a ligature. It would have to be a required ligature.
Since other ligature types may or may not be enabled in various contexts.
And we dont want default substitution and mark positioning to generate a
non-ligature equivalent.
>
> Aren’t all of the number combinations required ligatures?
>
> Michael
>
-- Andrew Cunningham lang.support_at_gmail.comReceived on Fri Jun 10 2016 - 22:26:19 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 10 2016 - 22:26:19 CDT