Re: IJ with accent

From: Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 00:01:17 +0100

On 6 Oct 2016, at 23:09, Lorna Evans <lorna_evans_at_sil.org> wrote:
>
> Has it been mentioned that U+0133 is not listed in the Soft_Dotted properties? So, that would indicate it shouldn't have the dot removed when you do put an acute over U+0133.

It ought to have that property.

Michael Everson
Received on Thu Oct 06 2016 - 18:01:58 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters?"
Previous message: Lorna Evans: "Re: IJ with accent"
In reply to: Lorna Evans: "Re: IJ with accent"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 06 2016 - 18:01:59 CDT