Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters?

From: Hans Åberg <haberg-1_at_telia.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 15:01:09 +0200

> On 9 Oct 2016, at 13:00, Mark Davis ☕️ <mark_at_macchiato.com> wrote:
>
> Essentially all of the game pieces that are in Unicode were added for compatibility with existing character sets. I'm guessing that there are hundreds to thousands of possible other symbols associated with games in one way or another,

There is http://www.chessvariants.com/.
Received on Sun Oct 09 2016 - 08:01:52 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marcel Schneider: "Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? / Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?"
Previous message: Oren Watson: "Re: Noto unified font"
In reply to: Mark Davis ☕️: "Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters?"
Next in thread: Marcel Schneider: "Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? / Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 09 2016 - 08:01:52 CDT