Re: Noto unified font

From: Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 19:03:53 -0600

Philippe Verdy wrote:

> I did not receive the message from David Starner you are quoting, it
> was probably not sent to this list but I did not received it privately
> (not even in my "spam mailbox").

http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2016-m10/0134.html

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

Received on Sun Oct 09 2016 - 20:04:39 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Fwd: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Noto unified font"
Maybe in reply to: James Kass: "Noto unified font"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 09 2016 - 20:04:39 CDT