XCCS (was: Historical question about 'universal signs')

From: Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:01:29 -0600

seth erickson wrote:

> XCCS is fairly well documented

That hasn't been my experience. I'd be interested in any links you can
forward that go beyond "Unicode built on" or "drew ideas from" or "was
influenced by" XCCS.

Thanks,

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

Received on Sun Oct 23 2016 - 12:02:26 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: announcements_at_unicode.org: "ICU 58 Released"
Previous message: seth erickson: "Historical question about 'universal signs'"
Next in thread: seth erickson: "Re: XCCS (was: Historical question about 'universal signs')"
Reply: seth erickson: "Re: XCCS (was: Historical question about 'universal signs')"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 23 2016 - 12:02:27 CDT