Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> At any rate, this isn't Unicode's problem. Unicode would not be
> creating anything in Klingon anyway!
Well, to be fair, I thought IPR was the primary reason Unicode had never
encoded the Apple logo either. I doubt that whether Unicode intended to
use such a character themselves was a factor. (Of course, users who
really wanted that character encoded are probably using 🍎 or 🍏
now.)
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.orgReceived on Fri Nov 04 2016 - 16:02:55 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 04 2016 - 16:02:55 CDT