Mats Blakstad wrote:
> For myself I was not actually considering the amount of speakers in
> each country, but to map languages with countries/territories where
> the language originated or have been spoken traditionally.
And that is where I think you'll have disagreement on the details.
> So I guess what matters is which language people mostly expect to find
> under the country/territory.
Yep, that's the challenge.
> Would it be possible to extend this dataset to all languages and start
> build an open source data set for language-territory mapping?
> http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/supplemental/language_territory_information.html
That's a good question for the CLDR folks, who have their own mailing
list.
Keep in mind that the CLDR table documents 675 of the world's best-known
languages, counting variants such as three different orthographies of
Uzbek. While anything is possible, extending this to "all languages,"
e.g. the other 6,300 lesser-known living languages, might require a bit
of time and money.
There is also a resource in the "UDHR in Unicode" project that might be
worth investigating, though it too is an imperfect match with what you
seem to be looking for.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.orgReceived on Thu Nov 10 2016 - 11:58:45 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 10 2016 - 11:58:46 CST