On 16 Nov 2016, at 01:47, Mark E. Shoulson <mark_at_kli.org> wrote:
>
> The defensiveness was not that Tolkienian scholarship was deemed "worthy", but more that Klingon's apparently was not.
Back in the day? No. It wasn’t.
> There was a Roadmap with pIqaD on it, and indeed you were the one who put it there. Nick Nicholas, in https://web.archive.org/web/20120307231609fw_/http://www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/Klingon/piqad.html credits you with a "delightful move of defiance" for replacing pIqaD with Sarati when it was removed.
That would be me.
>> The Roadmaps are really of no consequence. They’re useful, but they have no status and are subject to any kind of change before ballotting ends.
>
> Getting pIqaD off the "not-roadmapped" list is more important, both symbolically and, as Ken Whistler says, practically.
Ha’ ruch.
Michael
Received on Tue Nov 15 2016 - 20:19:50 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2016 - 20:19:50 CST