Re: About standardized variants of characters in Dingbat block

From: Mark Davis ☕️ <mark_at_macchiato.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 21:05:50 +0100

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Christoph Päper <
christoph.paeper_at_crissov.de> wrote:

> ✊✋✌️🦎🖖?
>

I'd use:
[image: ⛰] <http://unicode.org/emoji/charts-beta/full-emoji-list.html#26f0>[image:
📃][image: ✂][image: 🦎]
<http://unicode.org/emoji/charts-beta/full-emoji-list.html#1f98e>[image: 🖖]

Mark
Received on Tue Dec 27 2016 - 14:07:01 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: About standardized variants of characters in Dingbat block"
Previous message: Christoph Päper: "Re: About standardized variants of characters in Dingbat block"
In reply to: Christoph Päper: "Re: About standardized variants of characters in Dingbat block"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: About standardized variants of characters in Dingbat block"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: About standardized variants of characters in Dingbat block"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 27 2016 - 14:07:01 CST