Richard Wordingham wrote:
> I think it is not a 'typographical error' if it renders as it should!
What if it renders correctly on some systems but not on others?
I do see your point, though. Writing systems that permit different
spellings of the same glyph (cluster), only one of which is 'correct'
even after normalization, can be tricky like this. I think this would
still be a matter of 'misspelling' rather than 'miscoding' because a
typist should not have to be concerned with character codes per se.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.orgReceived on Wed Jan 18 2017 - 14:36:31 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 18 2017 - 14:36:32 CST