On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:35:33 -0800
Markus Scherer <markus.icu_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Richard Wordingham <
> richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> > > > 2) Claims that logical_order_exception is relevant for searching
> > > > (TUS, as above)
> >
> > > It informs the construction of the DUCET and could be used to
> > > suppress_contractions in a search tailoring (see CLDR root
> > > collation data file).
> >
> > It is irrelevant for searching. If one created a collation just for
> > searching, one wouldn't have to remove the effects of this
> > irrelevant property.
> >
>
> It narrows match boundaries and improves performance.
What is 'it'? If 'it' means 'removing the effects...', then it would be
irrelevant in a collation created just for searching. The effects
wouldn't be there to complicate matters. A search-only collation for
normalised, correctly spelt Thai would be simple; it would have no
contractions unless you wanted to claim that words containing <U+0E24
THAI CHARACTER RU, U+0E45 THAI CHARACTER LAKKHANGYAO> did not contain
<U+0E24>.)
Richard.
Received on Wed Jan 25 2017 - 15:45:23 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 25 2017 - 15:45:23 CST