Re: PETSCII mapping?

From: Rebecca T <637275_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:37:49 -0400

Count me in!

I’m partial for one large unified proposal, FWIW.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Rebecca Bettencourt <beckiergb_at_gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:
>
>> Michael Everson wrote:
>>
>> > Everybody interested, raise your hand…
>>
>> I'm in. <stands on the red mat>
>
>
> I'm in as well of course.
>
>
>> Rebecca Bettencourt wrote:
>>
>> > The question is, do we want to add these missing graphics characters
>> > incrementally, platform by platform, or put together a larger proposal
>> > for, say, one big Block Elements Extended block?
>>
>> I would guess the latter. There's no tremendous rush; there should be
>> time to do a proper analysis of target platforms, evaluate which
>> proposed characters should be unified with existing or other proposed
>> characters, and so forth.
>>
>> Of course there's no guarantee this will be the last request ever for
>> 8-bit computer compatibility characters, but there doesn't seem much
>> point in intentionally dragging the process out, platform by platform.
>>
>
> You make a good point. I'm in either way. :)
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 06 2017 - 15:38:11 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 06 2017 - 15:38:11 CDT